Is your bibliography really correct?

Verify Academic References, Citations, Evidence and Journals

No text of your own? Try an example — pick one and the tool checks it right away.Guest: 5 searches/day · Member: 250 references on day one, then 20/day (up to 75 a month) · Pro: 750 references a month.
File

The selected style determines the corrected bibliography below and the copied/downloaded output.

Use your target journal's style

Type the journal name; if its citation style is found, the corrected bibliography follows it.

or

Your text is processed in your browser and is never sent to Turnitin or any other plagiarism database. Reports are kept in My activity only for members, when “save to my account” is ticked.

How to use this tool

Paste a reference list (or upload a .txt/.docx/.pdf) and we verify each entry against scholarly databases — catching fabricated, mismatched, retracted or wrongly-formatted citations.

  1. Paste your references, or upload a file — from a full paper we auto-detect the bibliography section. .bib/.ris imports are also supported.
  2. Pick a citation style (APA 7, IEEE, Vancouver, MLA or a CSL style).
  3. Click “Verify”. Each reference is checked for reality (DOI / year / authors / journal), for formatting, and against the retraction database.
  4. Read the result: a colored badge (Verified / Unverified / Suspicious) and a 0–100 confidence score per entry.
  5. Click any citation to see the matched source record and where it was found.
  6. Copy the “Repaired bibliography” (complete, in-order list — verified entries rewritten, the rest kept as-is and numbered for manual checking) or download it as Word.
Full guide & PDF →

Used from 135+ university and institution networks, by journal editors and researchers.

What you get back

Every reference is searched in the academic indexes and marked with one of three outcomes:

Verified#1

Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.

A record was found and the title, authors and year match. The reference is real and was reformatted to your chosen style.

Unverified — please check#2

Devlin, J., et al. (2018). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. NAACL.

The source was searched but there is no certain match — the title matches while the year differs (record says 2019). Not necessarily wrong; check by hand before submission.

Suspicious / fabricated#3

Doe, J. (2023). A novel approach to early cancer diagnosis with deep learning. Journal of AI in Medicine, 12(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1234/jaim.2023.045

No match in CrossRef, OpenAlex, PubMed or any other index; the DOI does not resolve in any database — most likely fabricated.

Our study: in 53 of 100 theses approved in 2026, at least one reference had a broken DOI. Read the study →

Members get free weekly email alerts: new citations to your work (ORCID), new papers on a topic, new publications by an author you follow, and retractions of sources in your saved reports. Set up alerts →